Hair v. Crews

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hair v. Crews

116 So. 3d 616, 2013 WL 3305799, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10493

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 1, 2013

DocketNo. 1D13-1266

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 116 So. 3d 616 (Hair v. Crews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hair v. Crews, 116 So. 3d 616, 2013 WL 3305799, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10493 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appears that a petition for writ of habeas corpus placed into the hands of prison officials for mailing has been lost or misplaced so that the trial court cannot rule on the pleading. Accordingly, this petition for writ of mandamus is denied [617]*617without prejudice to petitioner’s right to refíle his pleading. The circuit court is requested to consider the pleading on an expedited basis. See Mills v. State, 507 So.2d 168 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appears that a petition for writ of habeas corpus placed into the hands of prison officials for mailing has been lost or misplaced so that the trial court cannot rule on the pleading. Accordingly, this petition for writ of mandamus is denied [617]*617without prejudice to petitioner’s right to refíle his pleading. The circuit court is requested to consider the pleading on an expedited basis. See Mills v. State, 507 So.2d 168 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 So. 3d 616, 2013 WL 3305799, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hair-v-crews-fladistctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack