Hainzer Unemployment Compensation Case
This text of 195 A.2d 842 (Hainzer Unemployment Compensation Case) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In this unemployment compensation case the bureau, referee and the board all concluded that thé ap[173]*173pellant voluntarily terminated her employment because of domestic reasons and that she was disqualified from receiving benefits under the provisions of §402(b) (2) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802(b) (2).
Claimant quit her full-time employment because her baby sitter left and she had no one to care for her five-year old child. This case is ruled by Dawkins Unemployment Compensation Case, 197 Pa. Superior Ct. 427, 178 A. 2d 775; and Domico Unemployment Compensation Case, 198 Pa. Superior Ct. 327, 181 A. 2d 731.
Decision affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
195 A.2d 842, 202 Pa. Super. 172, 1963 Pa. Super. LEXIS 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hainzer-unemployment-compensation-case-pasuperct-1963.