Hainzer Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Hainzer Unemployment Compensation Case

195 A.2d 842, 202 Pa. Super. 172, 1963 Pa. Super. LEXIS 532

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 12, 1963·No. Appeal, No. 272·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

In this unemployment compensation case the bureau, referee and the board all concluded that thé ap[173] pellant voluntarily terminated her employment because of domestic reasons and that she was disqualified from receiving benefits under the provisions of §402(b) (2) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802(b) (2).

Claimant quit her full-time employment because her baby sitter left and she had no one to care for her five-year old child. This case is ruled by Dawkins Unemployment Compensation Case, 197 Pa. Superior Ct. 427, 178 A. 2d 775; and Domico Unemployment Compensation Case, 198 Pa. Superior Ct. 327, 181 A. 2d 731.

Decision affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

In this unemployment compensation case the bureau, referee and the board all concluded that thé ap[173] pellant voluntarily terminated her employment because of domestic reasons and that she was disqualified from receiving benefits under the provisions of §402(b) (2) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802(b) (2).

Claimant quit her full-time employment because her baby sitter left and she had no one to care for her five-year old child. This case is ruled by Dawkins Unemployment Compensation Case, 197 Pa. Superior Ct. 427, 178 A. 2d 775; and Domico Unemployment Compensation Case, 198 Pa. Superior Ct. 327, 181 A. 2d 731.

Decision affirmed.

Hainzer Unemployment Compensation Case, 195 A.2d 842, 202 Pa. Super. 172, 1963 Pa. Super. LEXIS 532 (Pa. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

195 A.2d 842 (Hainzer Unemployment Compensation Case) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related