Hainsworth v. Martin

382 U.S. 109
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 22, 1965·No. 477·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having become moot in the light of the enactment of the Texas Apportionment Act of 1965, the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, Third Supreme Judicial District of Texas, is vacated, and the cause is remanded for such proceedings as by that court may be deemed appropriate.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart would dismiss the appeal for want of a substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hainsworth v. Martin, 382 U.S. 109 (1965).

382 U.S. 109 (Hainsworth v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lucas v. United States
757 S.W.2d 687 (Texas Supreme Court, 1988)