Hainsworth v. Martin

Supreme Court

Hainsworth v. Martin

382 U.S. 109

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 22, 1965

Docket477

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 382 U.S. 109 (Hainsworth v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hainsworth v. Martin, 382 U.S. 109 (1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having become moot in the light of the enactment of the Texas Apportionment Act of 1965, the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, Third Supreme Judicial District of Texas, is vacated, and the cause is remanded for such proceedings as by that court may be deemed appropriate.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart would dismiss the appeal for want of a substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having become moot in the light of the enactment of the Texas Apportionment Act of 1965, the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, Third Supreme Judicial District of Texas, is vacated, and the cause is remanded for such proceedings as by that court may be deemed appropriate.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart would dismiss the appeal for want of a substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

382 U.S. 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hainsworth-v-martin-scotus-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack