Haino v. Kiraly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Haino v. Kiraly

247 A.D. 776

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1936·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Action to recover damages for personal injuries and for loss of services. Plaintiffs were tenants in an apartment house owned by defendants. Plaintiff Gertrude Haino, in attempting to pull down the bathroom window of their apartment, was caused to lose her balance and fall into the bathtub when the frame or sash broke. Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless plaintiffs stipulate to reduce the judgment as entered in favor of the plaintiff Gertrude Haino to the sum of $2,682.20; in which event the judgment as so modified is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover damages for personal injuries and for loss of services. Plaintiffs were tenants in an apartment house owned by defendants. Plaintiff Gertrude Haino, in attempting to pull down the bathroom window of their apartment, was caused to lose her balance and fall into the bathtub when the frame or sash broke. Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless plaintiffs stipulate to reduce the judgment as entered in favor of the plaintiff Gertrude Haino to the sum of $2,682.20; in which event the judgment as so modified is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Haino v. Kiraly, 247 A.D. 776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

247 A.D. 776 (Haino v. Kiraly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related