Haino v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Haino v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

258 A.D. 1065, 18 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8913

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 7, 1940·Published

Opinion

Order providing for substitution of attorney in an action to recover damages for personal injuries modified by striking from the second ordering paragraph the words “ in the sum of $200.00 ” and substituting therefor the words “in a sum equal to 15%.” As so modified the order, in. so far as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. The original attorney waived in open court his right to have Ms compensation fixed on a lump sum basis. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order providing for substitution of attorney in an action to recover damages for personal injuries modified by striking from the second ordering paragraph the words “ in the sum of $200.00 ” and substituting therefor the words “in a sum equal to 15%.” As so modified the order, in. so far as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. The original attorney waived in open court his right to have Ms compensation fixed on a lump sum basis. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Haino v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp., 258 A.D. 1065, 18 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

258 A.D. 1065 (Haino v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.