Haino v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Haino v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.

258 A.D. 1065, 18 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8913

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 1065 (Haino v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haino v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp., 258 A.D. 1065, 18 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Order providing for substitution of attorney in an action to recover damages for personal injuries modified by striking from the second ordering paragraph the words “ in the sum of $200.00 ” and substituting therefor the words “in a sum equal to 15%.” As so modified the order, in. so far as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. The original attorney waived in open court his right to have Ms compensation fixed on a lump sum basis. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order providing for substitution of attorney in an action to recover damages for personal injuries modified by striking from the second ordering paragraph the words “ in the sum of $200.00 ” and substituting therefor the words “in a sum equal to 15%.” As so modified the order, in. so far as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. The original attorney waived in open court his right to have Ms compensation fixed on a lump sum basis. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 1065, 18 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haino-v-brooklyn-queens-transit-corp-nyappdiv-1940.