Hainey v. Alberry
This text of 73 Mo. 427 (Hainey v. Alberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the trial of this cause plaintiff offered to read in evidence a certified copy of the record of a deed dated October 25th, 1872, executed by the defendant Al-berry and wife, parties of the first part, to N. I. Thompson, party of the second part, and W. W. Oockins, party of the third part. This was objected to on the ground that the said deed was acknowledged before and certified to by said N. I. Thompson, who was a party thereto. This objection was overruled and the evidence offered was received, and it is chiefly this action of the court which is relied upon as error. Under the authority of the following cases: Dail v. Moore, 51 Mo. 589; Black v. Gregg, 58 Mo. 565; Stevens v. Hampton, 46 Mo. 404; Ryan v. Carr, 46 Mo. 483; 1 Wag. Stat., 277, §§ 24, 25, the court erred in admitting «aid evidence, there being no evidence in the record tending to show that the defendant, or those under whom he claimed, had actual notice of the said deed of October. 25th, 1872.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 Mo. 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hainey-v-alberry-mo-1881.