Haines v. Thompson
6 Misc. 622, 26 N.Y.S. 1135
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Haines v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 N.Y.S. 184 →
Opinion
We have examined the evidence very carefully and find no errors.
It involved a question of fact which was properly and fairly presented to the jury by the trial justice.
The jury found for the plaintiff and there was sufficient evidence upon which to base their verdict.
Judgment should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs. .
■Ehrlich, Oh. J., concurs.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haines v. Thompson, 6 Misc. 622, 26 N.Y.S. 1135 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
6 Misc. 622 (Haines v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.