Haines v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Haines v. State

60 S.E.2d 504, 82 Ga. App. 129, 1950 Ga. App. LEXIS 1066

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 14, 1950·No. 33098·Published

Opinion

Gardner, J.

The defendant was convicted of a misdemeanor in that he did ‘Svillfnlly shoot a hog . . whereby unjustifiable physical pain and suffering was caused to said hog” under the Code §§ 26-7902 and 26-7904. The assignment of error is on the general grounds only. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict.

The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre, P.J., and Townsend, J., concur. H. Alonzo Woods, for plaintiff in error. Darius N. Brown, Solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner, J.

The defendant was convicted of a misdemeanor in that he did ‘Svillfnlly shoot a hog . . whereby unjustifiable physical pain and suffering was caused to said hog” under the Code §§ 26-7902 and 26-7904. The assignment of error is on the general grounds only. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict.

The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre, P.J., and Townsend, J., concur. H. Alonzo Woods, for plaintiff in error. Darius N. Brown, Solicitor, contra.

Haines v. State, 60 S.E.2d 504, 82 Ga. App. 129, 1950 Ga. App. LEXIS 1066 (Ga. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

60 S.E.2d 504 (Haines v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.