Haines v. Patterson

New York Supreme Court

Haines v. Patterson

94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 109

DecidedMay 15, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 109 (Haines v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haines v. Patterson, 94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 109 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The parties having delayed some fifteen years before making any attempt to collect their costs, we think it is too late now for them to move to amend a decree in an action in which they are not parties for the purpose of effecting such collection.

The orders appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Present — Van Brunt, P. J., O’Brien and Parker, JJ.

Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

The parties having delayed some fifteen years before making any attempt to collect their costs, we think it is too late now for them to move to amend a decree in an action in which they are not parties for the purpose of effecting such collection.

The orders appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Present — Van Brunt, P. J., O’Brien and Parker, JJ.

Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haines-v-patterson-nysupct-1895.