Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Haines v. Olszewski

Haines v. Olszewski

59 A.D.2d 638, 398 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13501
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 29, 1977
StatusPublished

This text of 59 A.D.2d 638 (Haines v. Olszewski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haines v. Olszewski, 59 A.D.2d 638, 398 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13501 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

Motion, pursuant to CPLR 5518, for preliminary injunction pending appeal denied, without costs, on the ground that appellants have not sustained their burden of establishing both reasonable probability of success on the appeal and the existence of irreparable injury in the event an injunction does not issue (Matter of Schwartz v Rockefeller, 38 AD2d 995, app dsmd 30 NY2d 664). The court also notes that the appeal in this matter, taken some 17 months ago, has not yet been perfected. Kane, J. P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schwartz v. Rockfeller
282 N.E.2d 886 (New York Court of Appeals, 1972)
Schwartz v. Rockefeller
38 A.D.2d 995 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 A.D.2d 638, 398 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haines-v-olszewski-nyappdiv-1977.