Haines v. Olszewski
59 A.D.2d 638, 398 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13501
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 1977·Published
Opinion
Motion, pursuant to CPLR 5518, for preliminary injunction pending appeal denied, without costs, on the ground that appellants have not sustained their burden of establishing both reasonable probability of success on the appeal and the existence of irreparable injury in the event an injunction does not issue (Matter of Schwartz v Rockefeller, 38 AD2d 995, app dsmd 30 NY2d 664). The court also notes that the appeal in this matter, taken some 17 months ago, has not yet been perfected. Kane, J. P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haines v. Olszewski, 59 A.D.2d 638, 398 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13501 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).
59 A.D.2d 638 (Haines v. Olszewski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schwartz v. Rockfeller
282 N.E.2d 886 (New York Court of Appeals, 1972)
Schwartz v. Rockefeller
38 A.D.2d 995 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1972)