Haines v. Dearborn

49 A. 319, 199 Pa. 474, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 639
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 27, 1901·No. Appeal, No. 52·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We have examined and considered with care the report of the learned referee, together with the testimony and correspondence on which it is founded, and our conclusion is that no error appears in it which would authorize a modification or reversal of it in favor of the defendants. The exceptions filed to the report by the defendants were duly considered, passed upon, and finally dismissed by the court. As we are satisfied that a just conclusion was reached by the learned referee and approved by the court, we unhesitatingly affirm the judgment appealed from. We therefore dismiss all the assignments of error.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haines v. Dearborn, 49 A. 319, 199 Pa. 474, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 639 (Pa. 1901).

49 A. 319 (Haines v. Dearborn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walz v. Wilson Borough
6 Pa. D. & C. 534 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1924)
Freeman v. Lieberman
52 Pa. Super. 426 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)