Haines v. Black Diamond Properties, Inc.

176 So. 3d 1023, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15741, 2015 WL 6393786
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 23, 2015
DocketNo. 5D14-2262
StatusPublished

This text of 176 So. 3d 1023 (Haines v. Black Diamond Properties, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haines v. Black Diamond Properties, Inc., 176 So. 3d 1023, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15741, 2015 WL 6393786 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. Friedman v. Friedman, 825 So.2d 1010, 1011 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (language in judgment, “for which let execution issue,” unnecessary to obtain writ of [1024]*1024execution). We express conflict with DuBreuil v. Regnvall, 527 So.2d 249 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

AFFIRMED.

LAWSON, C.J., PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DuBreuil v. Regnvall
527 So. 2d 249 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Friedman v. Friedman
825 So. 2d 1010 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 So. 3d 1023, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15741, 2015 WL 6393786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haines-v-black-diamond-properties-inc-fladistctapp-2015.