Haines v. Backus
4 Wend. 213
This text of 4 Wend. 213 (Haines v. Backus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Haines v. Backus, 4 Wend. 213 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1830).
Opinion
By the Court,
The certiorari was clearly premature. Until inquisition found, there was nothing to remove. An inquisition cannot be found in this court; it can be obtained only in the method prescribed by statute, which manifestly contemplates the finding of the inquisition previous to the removal of the proceedings into this court. (2 R. S. 510, 11, § 20, 21, 22.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Schwarz v. County Court
14 Colo. 44 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1890)
Territory ex rel. Gray v. District Court
30 N.W. 145 (Supreme Court of Dakota, 1886)
Grinager v. Town of Norway
22 N.W. 174 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1885)
People ex rel. Pierce v. Covill
27 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 460 (New York Supreme Court, 1880)
Devlin v. Platt
11 Abb. Pr. 398 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1861)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Wend. 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haines-v-backus-nysupct-1830.