Haimowitz v. Haimowitz
68 So. 2d 588, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1780
This text of 68 So. 2d 588 (Haimowitz v. Haimowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Haimowitz v. Haimowitz, 68 So. 2d 588, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1780 (Fla. 1953).
Opinion
The record and briefs in this cause have been examined and the judgment appealed from is affirmed on authority of Bailey v. Smith, 89 Fla. 303, 103 So. 833; Lippman v. Shapiro, 151 Fla. 327, 9 So.2d 636; Ake v. Chancey, 152 Fla. 677, 13 So.2d 6; Knapp v. Fredrickson, 148 Fla. 311, 4 So.2d 251 and Sapir v. Sapir, Fla., 53 So.2d 925.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bailey v. Smith
103 So. 833 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Knapp v. Fredricksen
4 So. 2d 251 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Lippman v. Shapiro
9 So. 2d 636 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1942)
Ake v. Chancey
13 So. 2d 6 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
68 So. 2d 588, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haimowitz-v-haimowitz-fla-1953.