Haimes v. New York Telephone Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Haimes v. New York Telephone Co.

60 A.D.2d 959, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10020

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 26, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.D.2d 959 (Haimes v. New York Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haimes v. New York Telephone Co., 60 A.D.2d 959, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10020 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: "Did the Trial Term err as a matter of law in dismissing plaintiffs complaint?” Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: "Did the Trial Term err as a matter of law in dismissing plaintiffs complaint?” Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.2d 959, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haimes-v-new-york-telephone-co-nyappdiv-1978.