Haimerl v. Haimerl

61 A.2d 439, 142 N.J. Eq. 740
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedSeptember 5, 1948
StatusPublished

This text of 61 A.2d 439 (Haimerl v. Haimerl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haimerl v. Haimerl, 61 A.2d 439, 142 N.J. Eq. 740 (N.J. 1948).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Egan.

For affirmance — Bodine, Donges, Colie, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Jacobs, Wells, Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 11.

For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Heher, Dill, JJ. 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 A.2d 439, 142 N.J. Eq. 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haimerl-v-haimerl-nj-1948.