Haim v. Castro

272 A.D.2d 574, 709 N.Y.S.2d 828, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6019
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 30, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 272 A.D.2d 574 (Haim v. Castro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haim v. Castro, 272 A.D.2d 574, 709 N.Y.S.2d 828, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6019 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated February 9, 1999, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability, is in favor of the defendant and against them and dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The jury verdict in favor of the defendant should not be set [575]*575aside as against the weight of the evidence because it was based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Grippo v Sinatra, 265 AD2d 301; Manna v Don Diego, 261 AD2d 590; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contention is without merit. Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farrell v. Lewarn
275 A.D.2d 760 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 A.D.2d 574, 709 N.Y.S.2d 828, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haim-v-castro-nyappdiv-2000.