Hailston v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hailston v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

243 A.D. 835

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 835 (Hailston v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hailston v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 243 A.D. 835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Action under section 109 of the Insurance Law. Insurance company defended upon the ground, first, that the solvency of the insured defendants in the negligence case had not been shown, and second, that there had been a breach of a condition of the policy because the defendants had failed to co-operate in the defense of the negligence action. These questions of fact were decided by the jury. Judgment and order unanimously "affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action under section 109 of the Insurance Law. Insurance company defended upon the ground, first, that the solvency of the insured defendants in the negligence case had not been shown, and second, that there had been a breach of a condition of the policy because the defendants had failed to co-operate in the defense of the negligence action. These questions of fact were decided by the jury. Judgment and order unanimously "affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hailston-v-new-amsterdam-casualty-co-nyappdiv-1935.