Hailey v. Donahoe

Fourth Circuit

Hailey v. Donahoe

499 F. App'x 327

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2012·No. No. 12-2166·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stacey Hailey appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his claims of employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Hailey’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hailey v. Donahoe, No. 6:11-cv-00022-NKM-RSB, 2012 WL 4458451 (W.D.Va. July 30, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stacey Hailey appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his claims of employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Hailey’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hailey v. Donahoe, No. 6:11-cv-00022-NKM-RSB, 2012 WL 4458451 (W.D.Va. July 30, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hailey v. Donahoe, 499 F. App'x 327 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

499 F. App'x 327 (Hailey v. Donahoe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.