Hailey v. Bank of America, N.A.

455 F. App'x 290
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 22, 2011
DocketNo. 11-1801
StatusPublished

This text of 455 F. App'x 290 (Hailey v. Bank of America, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hailey v. Bank of America, N.A., 455 F. App'x 290 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terri Hailey and Jerry Scott Hailey appeal the district court’s order dismissing the claim filed under the Truth and Lending Act and remanding the remaining claims to state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the' reasons stated by the district court. Hailey v. Bank of Am., N.A., No. 3:11-cv-00269-HEH, 2011 WL 2618739 (E.D.Va. July 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
455 F. App'x 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hailey-v-bank-of-america-na-ca4-2011.