Hailey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Hailey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

311 So. 2d 542, 1975 La. App. LEXIS 4235

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 21, 1975

DocketNo. 4948

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 311 So. 2d 542 (Hailey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hailey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 311 So. 2d 542, 1975 La. App. LEXIS 4235 (La. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

FRUGÉ, Judge.

This case was consolidated for trial with United Credit Plan of Jena, Inc. v. Hailey, 311 So.2d 539 (La.App. 3rd 1975). Plaintiff, Jean Hailey, was a passenger in the automobile driven by Sammie Hailey at the time of the accident in question. She sought recovery from Aetna Casualty and Surety Company for her personal injuries under the liability and uninsured motorist provisions of the policy issued to Sammie Hailey. The issue raised in this case is identical to the issue raised in the above cited case.

For the reasons assigned in United Credit Plan of Jena, Inc. v. Hailey, supra, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the case is remanded for trial on the merits. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the defendant-appellee.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FRUGÉ, Judge.

This case was consolidated for trial with United Credit Plan of Jena, Inc. v. Hailey, 311 So.2d 539 (La.App. 3rd 1975). Plaintiff, Jean Hailey, was a passenger in the automobile driven by Sammie Hailey at the time of the accident in question. She sought recovery from Aetna Casualty and Surety Company for her personal injuries under the liability and uninsured motorist provisions of the policy issued to Sammie Hailey. The issue raised in this case is identical to the issue raised in the above cited case.

For the reasons assigned in United Credit Plan of Jena, Inc. v. Hailey, supra, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the case is remanded for trial on the merits. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the defendant-appellee.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

311 So. 2d 542, 1975 La. App. LEXIS 4235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hailey-v-aetna-casualty-surety-co-lactapp-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack