Haile v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Haile v. United States

24 Cust. Ct. 450, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1929

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 2, 1950

DocketNo. 54304; protest 151068-K (Galveston)

StatusPublished

This text of 24 Cust. Ct. 450 (Haile v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haile v. United States, 24 Cust. Ct. 450, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1929 (cusc 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, counsel for the Government moved in evidence the collector's answer to the protest. A letter from the plaintiff, dated November 10, 1948, disclosed that the Civil Aeronautics Administration regional office shipped the involved crystals, an American product, to its Balboa station, and that they were returned to the Airways Facilities Shop for repair and return to said Balboa station. In the collector’s answer to the protest, he stated that had said letter of November 10, 1948, been a part of the record at the time of liquida[451]*451tion, a waiver of the certificate of exportation would have been granted, and favorable action on the protest was recommended. In view of the evidence before the court, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, counsel for the Government moved in evidence the collector's answer to the protest. A letter from the plaintiff, dated November 10, 1948, disclosed that the Civil Aeronautics Administration regional office shipped the involved crystals, an American product, to its Balboa station, and that they were returned to the Airways Facilities Shop for repair and return to said Balboa station. In the collector’s answer to the protest, he stated that had said letter of November 10, 1948, been a part of the record at the time of liquida[451]*451tion, a waiver of the certificate of exportation would have been granted, and favorable action on the protest was recommended. In view of the evidence before the court, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 Cust. Ct. 450, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haile-v-united-states-cusc-1950.