Haile v. Haile

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Haile v. Haile

502 So. 2d 86, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 500

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 11, 1987

DocketNo. 4-86-0011

StatusPublished

This text of 502 So. 2d 86 (Haile v. Haile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haile v. Haile, 502 So. 2d 86, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 500 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In arriving at the judgment of dissolution of marriage, the trial court did not consider the husband’s pension as a marital asset. At the time of the final hearing the court did not have the benefit of Diffender-fer v. Diffenderfer, 491 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1986).

We reverse those portions of the final judgment relating to alimony and the pension so that they may be reconsidered by the court under Diffenderfer. We make no prejudgment concerning the manner nor extent to which this should alter the final judgment.

With respect to the issue of attorney’s fees, and in all other respects, the final judgment is affirmed.

[87]*87We therefore reverse in part and remand to the trial court for further proceedings,

DELL, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI