Haile v. Davis

590 P.2d 580, 99 Idaho 853, 1979 Ida. LEXIS 379
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided February 9, 1979·No. No. 12516·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Hailes performed certain earth moving and land leveling services on land [854] owned by the Davises. After appellants refused to pay, respondents filed their claim of lien and commenced this action.

The district court found, inter alia, that (1) the parties had entered into a contract for the services; (2) that the services were performed in a workmanlike manner according to the contract terms; and (3) that appellants received the full value of their contract. Judgment was entered for respondents at the contract price and attorney fees were awarded pursuant to the lien statute.

The sole issue on appeal is whether there is substantial, competent evidence to support the district court’s findings. We have reviewed the record and we conclude that it does support the findings. Appellants contentions to the contrary are without merit. The judgment is affirmed. Respondents’ request for attorney fees on appeal is denied. Ivie v. Peck, 94 Idaho 625, 495 P.2d 1110 (1972); Hendrix v. Gold Ridge Mines, Inc., 54 Idaho 326, 54 P.2d 254 (1936). Costs to respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haile v. Davis, 590 P.2d 580, 99 Idaho 853, 1979 Ida. LEXIS 379 (Idaho 1979).

590 P.2d 580 (Haile v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

W. F. Construction Co. v. Kalik
652 P.2d 661 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1982)
Burke v. State
624 P.2d 1240 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1980)
State v. Garcia
594 P.2d 146 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1979)
State v. Warden
592 P.2d 836 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1979)
Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.
591 P.2d 1078 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1979)
State v. Adair
587 P.2d 1238 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1978)