Haile v. Davis

Idaho Supreme Court

Haile v. Davis

590 P.2d 580, 99 Idaho 853, 1979 Ida. LEXIS 379

CourtIdaho Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 9, 1979

DocketNo. 12516

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 590 P.2d 580 (Haile v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haile v. Davis, 590 P.2d 580, 99 Idaho 853, 1979 Ida. LEXIS 379 (Idaho 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Hailes performed certain earth moving and land leveling services on land [854]*854owned by the Davises. After appellants refused to pay, respondents filed their claim of lien and commenced this action.

The district court found, inter alia, that (1) the parties had entered into a contract for the services; (2) that the services were performed in a workmanlike manner according to the contract terms; and (3) that appellants received the full value of their contract. Judgment was entered for respondents at the contract price and attorney fees were awarded pursuant to the lien statute.

The sole issue on appeal is whether there is substantial, competent evidence to support the district court’s findings. We have reviewed the record and we conclude that it does support the findings. Appellants contentions to the contrary are without merit. The judgment is affirmed. Respondents’ request for attorney fees on appeal is denied. Ivie v. Peck, 94 Idaho 625, 495 P.2d 1110 (1972); Hendrix v. Gold Ridge Mines, Inc., 54 Idaho 326, 54 P.2d 254 (1936). Costs to respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Hailes performed certain earth moving and land leveling services on land [854]*854owned by the Davises. After appellants refused to pay, respondents filed their claim of lien and commenced this action.

The district court found, inter alia, that (1) the parties had entered into a contract for the services; (2) that the services were performed in a workmanlike manner according to the contract terms; and (3) that appellants received the full value of their contract. Judgment was entered for respondents at the contract price and attorney fees were awarded pursuant to the lien statute.

The sole issue on appeal is whether there is substantial, competent evidence to support the district court’s findings. We have reviewed the record and we conclude that it does support the findings. Appellants contentions to the contrary are without merit. The judgment is affirmed. Respondents’ request for attorney fees on appeal is denied. Ivie v. Peck, 94 Idaho 625, 495 P.2d 1110 (1972); Hendrix v. Gold Ridge Mines, Inc., 54 Idaho 326, 54 P.2d 254 (1936). Costs to respondents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

590 P.2d 580, 99 Idaho 853, 1979 Ida. LEXIS 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haile-v-davis-idaho-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack