Haigler v. State

235 S.W. 1093, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 634
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 21, 1921·No. No. 6486·Published

Opinion

MORROW, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor. After his conviction, the law under which he was prosecuted was changed by act of the Legislature. At the time of the trial it was unlawful, under the statute, to possess intoxicating liquors except for scientific, mechanical, medicinal, or sacramental purposes. By the new law, the possession is made unlawful only in the event it was possessed for sale.

The court has held that the new law operates to annul convictions pending on appeal in similar cases. Cox v. State (No. 6423) 234 S. W. 531, and Petit v. State (No. 6510) 235 S. W. 579, not yet [officially] reported.

The judgment must therefore be reversed, and the cause dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haigler v. State, 235 S.W. 1093, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 634 (Tex. 1921).

235 S.W. 1093 (Haigler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

U. S. Petit v. State
235 S.W. 579 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)