Haight v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Haight v. State

552 S.W.3d 798

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 31, 2018

DocketWD 80832

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 552 S.W.3d 798 (Haight v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haight v. State, 552 S.W.3d 798 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

*799Kevin B. Haight appeals the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 motion in which he sought to vacate his conviction and sentence for forcible rape ( § 566.030, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2010) on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

*799Kevin B. Haight appeals the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 motion in which he sought to vacate his conviction and sentence for forcible rape ( § 566.030, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2010) on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

552 S.W.3d 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haight-v-state-moctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack