Haight v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Haight v. State

552 S.W.3d 798

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 31, 2018·No. WD 80832·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

*799Kevin B. Haight appeals the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 motion in which he sought to vacate his conviction and sentence for forcible rape ( § 566.030, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2010) on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

*799Kevin B. Haight appeals the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 motion in which he sought to vacate his conviction and sentence for forcible rape ( § 566.030, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2010) on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Haight v. State, 552 S.W.3d 798 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

552 S.W.3d 798 (Haight v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related