Haight v. Serota
This text of 258 A.D. 901 (Haight v. Serota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, plaintiffs appeal from an order (a) denying their motion for confirmation of the report of an official referee, (b) disapproving the referee’s finding as to the value af the property on the date of sale, (c) making a new finding as to such value, and (d) directing that plaintiffs shall not recover a deficiency judgment. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 A.D. 901, 16 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haight-v-serota-nyappdiv-1939.