Haight v. Serota

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Haight v. Serota

258 A.D. 901, 16 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7505

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 11, 1939·Published

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, plaintiffs appeal from an order (a) denying their motion for confirmation of the report of an official referee, (b) disapproving the referee’s finding as to the value af the property on the date of sale, (c) making a new finding as to such value, and (d) directing that plaintiffs shall not recover a deficiency judgment. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, plaintiffs appeal from an order (a) denying their motion for confirmation of the report of an official referee, (b) disapproving the referee’s finding as to the value af the property on the date of sale, (c) making a new finding as to such value, and (d) directing that plaintiffs shall not recover a deficiency judgment. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Haight v. Serota, 258 A.D. 901, 16 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7505 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

258 A.D. 901 (Haight v. Serota) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.