Haight v. Drivetime Car Sales Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Haight v. Drivetime Car Sales Co.

555 S.W.3d 478

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 29, 2018·No. WD 81164·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

*479DriveTime Car Sales Company, LLC appeals from the ruling of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, denying its motion to compel David and Gifty Haight to arbitrate their claims against DriveTime for malicious prosecution, abuse of process, and violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The Circuit Court's ruling is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

*479DriveTime Car Sales Company, LLC appeals from the ruling of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, denying its motion to compel David and Gifty Haight to arbitrate their claims against DriveTime for malicious prosecution, abuse of process, and violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The Circuit Court's ruling is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Haight v. Drivetime Car Sales Co., 555 S.W.3d 478 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

555 S.W.3d 478 (Haight v. Drivetime Car Sales Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.