Haig v. Commissioners of Confiscated Estates

1 S.C. Eq. 112
Court of Chancery of South Carolina·Decided July 1, 1784·Published

Opinion

It was ordered, (a rule having been before taken out,) that an attachment do peremptorily issue against James Neilson, unless the terms of sale are complied with in three weeks from this time»

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haig v. Commissioners of Confiscated Estates, 1 S.C. Eq. 112 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1784).

1 S.C. Eq. 112 (Haig v. Commissioners of Confiscated Estates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.