Haig v. Commissioners of Confiscated Estates

1 S.C. Eq. 112
CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina
DecidedJuly 1, 1784
StatusPublished

This text of 1 S.C. Eq. 112 (Haig v. Commissioners of Confiscated Estates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haig v. Commissioners of Confiscated Estates, 1 S.C. Eq. 112 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1784).

Opinion

It was ordered, (a rule having been before taken out,) that an attachment do peremptorily issue against James Neilson, unless the terms of sale are complied with in three weeks from this time»

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 S.C. Eq. 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haig-v-commissioners-of-confiscated-estates-ctchansc-1784.