Haidary v. W. H. Patterson & Co.
182 So. 2d 671, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 3772
Opinion
This case is a companion to Muse v. Patterson &' Company, et al, on the docket of this court this day decided and reported in 182 So.2d 665.
For the reasons assigned in the companion case, the demands of the plaintiff herein are rejected.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed at appellant’s costs.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haidary v. W. H. Patterson & Co., 182 So. 2d 671, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 3772 (La. Ct. App. 1965).
182 So. 2d 671 (Haidary v. W. H. Patterson & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Muse v. WH Patterson & Company
182 So. 2d 665 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1965)