Haidary v. W. H. Patterson & Co.
182 So. 2d 671, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 3772
This text of 182 So. 2d 671 (Haidary v. W. H. Patterson & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Haidary v. W. H. Patterson & Co., 182 So. 2d 671, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 3772 (La. Ct. App. 1965).
Opinion
This case is a companion to Muse v. Patterson &' Company, et al, on the docket of this court this day decided and reported in 182 So.2d 665.
For the reasons assigned in the companion case, the demands of the plaintiff herein are rejected.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed at appellant’s costs.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Muse v. WH Patterson & Company
182 So. 2d 665 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1965)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
182 So. 2d 671, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 3772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haidary-v-w-h-patterson-co-lactapp-1965.