Hahn v. W. N. Johnson Auto Sheet Metal Works

152 N.E. 926, 85 Ind. App. 694, 1926 Ind. App. LEXIS 185
Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided June 23, 1926·No. No. 12,612.·Published

Opinion

Thompson, J.

Appellant filed an application for 'compensation. Appellee filed a motion to dismiss said application for the alleged reason that the claim was barred by the statute of limitation. Appellee’s motion was overruled. At the hearing, the parties agreed on a statement of facts in the case. The Industrial Board denied compensation.

The facts in this case are in some respects similar to the case of Evansville, etc., Milk Co. v. Allen (1926), 84 Ind. App. 199, 150 N. E. 793, but they are not identical, as in that case there was an application for adjustment of compensation and not for review on account of changed conditions as in the instant case. The facts in this case are such as to bring it within the rule laid down in In re Hogan (1921), 75 Ind. App. 53, 129 N. E. 633, and, on authority of that case, the award is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hahn v. W. N. Johnson Auto Sheet Metal Works, 152 N.E. 926, 85 Ind. App. 694, 1926 Ind. App. LEXIS 185 (Ind. Ct. App. 1926).

152 N.E. 926 (Hahn v. W. N. Johnson Auto Sheet Metal Works) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Evansville, Etc., Milk Co. v. Allen
150 N.E. 793 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1926)
In re Hogan
129 N.E. 633 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1921)