Hahn v. W. N. Johnson Auto Sheet Metal Works

Indiana Court of Appeals

Hahn v. W. N. Johnson Auto Sheet Metal Works

152 N.E. 926, 85 Ind. App. 694, 1926 Ind. App. LEXIS 185

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 23, 1926

DocketNo. 12,612.

StatusPublished

This text of 152 N.E. 926 (Hahn v. W. N. Johnson Auto Sheet Metal Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hahn v. W. N. Johnson Auto Sheet Metal Works, 152 N.E. 926, 85 Ind. App. 694, 1926 Ind. App. LEXIS 185 (Ind. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Thompson, J.

Appellant filed an application for 'compensation. Appellee filed a motion to dismiss said application for the alleged reason that the claim was barred by the statute of limitation. Appellee’s motion was overruled. At the hearing, the parties agreed on a statement of facts in the case. The Industrial Board denied compensation.

The facts in this case are in some respects similar to the case of Evansville, etc., Milk Co. v. Allen (1926), 84 Ind. App. 199, 150 N. E. 793, but they are not identical, as in that case there was an application for adjustment of compensation and not for review on account of changed conditions as in the instant case. The facts in this case are such as to bring it within the rule laid down in In re Hogan (1921), 75 Ind. App. 53, 129 N. E. 633, and, on authority of that case, the award is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson, J.

Appellant filed an application for 'compensation. Appellee filed a motion to dismiss said application for the alleged reason that the claim was barred by the statute of limitation. Appellee’s motion was overruled. At the hearing, the parties agreed on a statement of facts in the case. The Industrial Board denied compensation.

The facts in this case are in some respects similar to the case of Evansville, etc., Milk Co. v. Allen (1926), 84 Ind. App. 199, 150 N. E. 793, but they are not identical, as in that case there was an application for adjustment of compensation and not for review on account of changed conditions as in the instant case. The facts in this case are such as to bring it within the rule laid down in In re Hogan (1921), 75 Ind. App. 53, 129 N. E. 633, and, on authority of that case, the award is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 N.E. 926, 85 Ind. App. 694, 1926 Ind. App. LEXIS 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hahn-v-w-n-johnson-auto-sheet-metal-works-indctapp-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack