Hahn v. Rychling
716 N.E.2d 179, 93 N.Y.2d 954, 694 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1400
This text of 716 N.E.2d 179 (Hahn v. Rychling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hahn v. Rychling, 716 N.E.2d 179, 93 N.Y.2d 954, 694 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1400 (N.Y. 1999).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that appellants, having taken no appeal to the Appellate Division, may not appeal to the Court of Appeals from the Appellate Division order of affirmance.
Judge Levine taking no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
716 N.E.2d 179, 93 N.Y.2d 954, 694 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hahn-v-rychling-ny-1999.