Hahn v. Oregon State Penitentiary
773 P.2d 829, 96 Or. App. 759
Opinion
Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary that found that he had violated a disciplinary rule and imposed, inter alia, a $100 fine. He contends that there is not sufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty and that his actions were justified as self-defense, but the contentions lack merit. However, respondent concedes, and we agree, that the fine is unlawful. Watson v. OSP, 90 Or App 85, 750 P2d 1188 (1988).
Fine vacated; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hahn v. Oregon State Penitentiary, 773 P.2d 829, 96 Or. App. 759 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).
773 P.2d 829 (Hahn v. Oregon State Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Watson v. Oregon State Penitentiary
750 P.2d 1188 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)