Hahn v. I-T-E. Circuit Breaker Co.
162 F.2d 414, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2137
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided June 30, 1947·No. No. 9353·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We find no abuse of discretion by the Court below in refusing to grant a new trial to the appellant. , As this is the only point in the case, the judgment of the District Court will therefore be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hahn v. I-T-E. Circuit Breaker Co., 162 F.2d 414, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2137 (3d Cir. 1947).
162 F.2d 414 (Hahn v. I-T-E. Circuit Breaker Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States Ex Rel. Birch v. Fay
190 F. Supp. 105 (S.D. New York, 1961)
United States of America Ex Rel. Earl Richard Saunders v. David N. Myers, Warden, Eastern State Penitentiary, Graterford, Pennsylvania
276 F.2d 790 (Third Circuit, 1960)