Hahn v. Hahn

270 So. 3d 410
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 2019·No. No. 4D17-3919·Published

Opinion

Weiss, Daliah H., Associate Judge.

Appellant raises multiple points on appeal. Points one, two, and five, as numbered in appellant's brief, pertain to Erica and Brooke Hahn. Points three, four, six, and seven address Wayne Kaplan and Wayne Kaplan, P.A. On all issues involving the Hahns, we affirm without discussion. On the remaining issues concerning Wayne Kaplan and Wayne Kaplan, P.A., we dismiss the appeal due to the pendency of a counterclaim in the lower court. See Mendez v. W. Flagler Family Ass'n , 303 So.2d 1, 5 (Fla. 1974).

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part .

Warner and Gross, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hahn v. Hahn, 270 So. 3d 410 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

270 So. 3d 410 (Hahn v. Hahn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mendez v. West Flagler Family Association, Inc.
303 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)