Hahn v. Graco, Inc.

725 N.W.2d 375, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 911, 2006 WL 3848948
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 28, 2006·No. A06-1737·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 17, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that, “[sjummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ G. Barry Anderson Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hahn v. Graco, Inc., 725 N.W.2d 375, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 911, 2006 WL 3848948 (Mich. 2006).

725 N.W.2d 375 (Hahn v. Graco, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)