Hahn, C., Aplt. v. OOR

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 2, 2025·No. 27 WAP 2025·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

CARRIE HAHN, : No. 27 WAP 2025 :

Appellant :

: :

v. :

: :

THE OFFICE OF OPEN RECORDS, :

:

Appellee :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of December, 2025, the Notice of Appeal is QUASHED.

See In re Merrick’s Estate, 247 A.2d 786, 787-88 (Pa. 1968) (explaining that an appeal

does not lie from an order denying reconsideration); Pa.R.A.P. 1701(b)(3) (providing that

the 30-day appeal period will be tolled only by a grant of reconsideration within the time

for filing a notice of appeal); see also 42 Pa.C.S. § 723(a) (discussing this Court’s

jurisdiction over appeals from final orders of the Commonwealth Court); Pa.R.A.P. 341(b)

(defining final orders). Appellant’s “Application for Supersedeas/Stay Pending Appeal” is

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hahn, C., Aplt. v. OOR, (Pa. 2025).

Hahn, C., Aplt. v. OOR (Hahn, C., Aplt. v. OOR) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Merrick Estate
247 A.2d 786 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)