Hahn, C., Aplt. v. OOR
This text of Hahn, C., Aplt. v. OOR (Hahn, C., Aplt. v. OOR) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
CARRIE HAHN, : No. 27 WAP 2025 : Appellant : : : v. : : : THE OFFICE OF OPEN RECORDS, : : Appellee :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 2nd day of December, 2025, the Notice of Appeal is QUASHED.
See In re Merrick’s Estate, 247 A.2d 786, 787-88 (Pa. 1968) (explaining that an appeal
does not lie from an order denying reconsideration); Pa.R.A.P. 1701(b)(3) (providing that
the 30-day appeal period will be tolled only by a grant of reconsideration within the time
for filing a notice of appeal); see also 42 Pa.C.S. § 723(a) (discussing this Court’s
jurisdiction over appeals from final orders of the Commonwealth Court); Pa.R.A.P. 341(b)
(defining final orders). Appellant’s “Application for Supersedeas/Stay Pending Appeal” is
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hahn, C., Aplt. v. OOR, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hahn-c-aplt-v-oor-pa-2025.