Hague v. Cone

The Superior Court of New York City

Hague v. Cone

52 N.Y. St. Rep. 942

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedMay 9, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 942 (Hague v. Cone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hague v. Cone, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 942 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Fitzsimons, J.

The debt of defendant to plaintiff was clearly proved, the defense of payment was a question was lo satisfaction of the jury.

The claim made by defendant that plaintiff applied the proceeds of her husband’s note to the payment of the cause of action at bar was disbelieved by the . jury. They evidently believed that said note was applied in payment of the husband’s debt as agreed upon by plaintiff and defendant’s husband.

Finding no error tue judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Ehrlioh, Oh. J,, concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fitzsimons, J.

The debt of defendant to plaintiff was clearly proved, the defense of payment was a question was lo satisfaction of the jury.

The claim made by defendant that plaintiff applied the proceeds of her husband’s note to the payment of the cause of action at bar was disbelieved by the . jury. They evidently believed that said note was applied in payment of the husband’s debt as agreed upon by plaintiff and defendant’s husband.

Finding no error tue judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Ehrlioh, Oh. J,, concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 N.Y. St. Rep. 942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hague-v-cone-nysuperctnyc-1893.