Hagood v. Hutton

33 Mo. 244
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1862
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 33 Mo. 244 (Hagood v. Hutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hagood v. Hutton, 33 Mo. 244 (Mo. 1862).

Opinion

Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a petition for an injunction to restrain the City of Lagrange from collecting a special tax upon real estate, levied for the purpose of improving roads outside of the city limits. The defendant answered, and afterward the plaintiff filed an amended petition, which of itself stated no cause of action, and was obviously intended to be only amendatory of, and additional to, the original petition. We do not, however, look beyond the amended petition, and as that states no cause of action, the judgment for the defendants must necessarily be affirmed.

In order, however, to settle the case finally, we add that the Legislature had power to authorize the City of Lagrange to expend money upon the improvement of roads outside of the limits o'f the city.

Judgment affirmed;

Judge Bay concurs; Judge Dryden having been of counsel in the court below did not sit in the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Opinion of The Justices
88 So. 2d 778 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1956)
State Ex Rel. Gillespie v. Walthall
169 So. 552 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Kansas City v. Mullins
209 S.W. 558 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1919)
City of Memphis v. Hastings
113 Tenn. 142 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Mo. 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagood-v-hutton-mo-1862.