Hagner v. Musgrove

1 U.S. 83, 1 Dall. 83

This text of 1 U.S. 83 (Hagner v. Musgrove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hagner v. Musgrove, 1 U.S. 83, 1 Dall. 83 (1784).

Opinion

THE plaintiff having had a verdict in the abscence of the defendant, and having agreed to withdraw it, and submit to a referrence, three persons, nominated by the Court, accordingly met. Upon entering into the case, the parties, who were present, began a warm altercation, which proving troublesome to the referrees, they ordered the disputants to withdraw, and called the witnesses one after another, examining them separately out of the hearing of both plaintiff and defendant, and finally reported in favour of the former.

These facts being established, the report was set aside, on motion of the defendant’s counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 U.S. 83, 1 Dall. 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagner-v-musgrove-pactcomplphilad-1784.