Hagins v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Hagins v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co.

165 S.E.2d 501, 275 N.C. 106, 1969 N.C. LEXIS 352

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJanuary 31, 1969

DocketNo. 684

StatusPublished

This text of 165 S.E.2d 501 (Hagins v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hagins v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co., 165 S.E.2d 501, 275 N.C. 106, 1969 N.C. LEXIS 352 (N.C. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER Curiam.

This is a companion case to Hagins v. Redevelopment Commission, decided this day and reported ante 90. It is referred to in [107]*107sufficient detail in the statement of facts in that case to disclose that decision there controls decision here. See also the statement of facts preceding the final four paragraphs in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. 1 N.C. App. 51, 55, 159 S.E. 2d 592, 595.

For the reasons stated in Hagins v. Redevelopment Commission, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and this cause is remanded to that Court with the direction that it vacate the judgment of the Superior Court from which plaintiff appealed and remand the case to that court for such further proceedings, consistent with the legal principles herein enunciated, as may be initiated.

Error and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER Curiam.

This is a companion case to Hagins v. Redevelopment Commission, decided this day and reported ante 90. It is referred to in [107]*107sufficient detail in the statement of facts in that case to disclose that decision there controls decision here. See also the statement of facts preceding the final four paragraphs in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. 1 N.C. App. 51, 55, 159 S.E. 2d 592, 595.

For the reasons stated in Hagins v. Redevelopment Commission, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and this cause is remanded to that Court with the direction that it vacate the judgment of the Superior Court from which plaintiff appealed and remand the case to that court for such further proceedings, consistent with the legal principles herein enunciated, as may be initiated.

Error and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 S.E.2d 501, 275 N.C. 106, 1969 N.C. LEXIS 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagins-v-aero-mayflower-transit-co-nc-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack