Hagin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hagin v. State

875 So. 2d 732, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8307, 2004 WL 1284206

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 11, 2004

DocketNo. 2D03-4859

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 875 So. 2d 732 (Hagin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hagin v. State, 875 So. 2d 732, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8307, 2004 WL 1284206 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Johnny Hagin appeals the denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the denial of Hagin’s first claim without discussion. As for his second claim, in which he alleged that the circuit court failed to award him proper prison credit pursuant to the holding in Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993), we affirm because the record indicates that the circuit court did in fact award such credit. If the Department of Corrections has erred in the computation and application of such credit, Hagin should seek relief through the administrative remedies available within the Department and then by way of petition for writ of mandamus in the appropriate circuit court. See Battles v. State, 799 So.2d 1098 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Affirmed.

SALCINES and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Johnny Hagin appeals the denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the denial of Hagin’s first claim without discussion. As for his second claim, in which he alleged that the circuit court failed to award him proper prison credit pursuant to the holding in Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993), we affirm because the record indicates that the circuit court did in fact award such credit. If the Department of Corrections has erred in the computation and application of such credit, Hagin should seek relief through the administrative remedies available within the Department and then by way of petition for writ of mandamus in the appropriate circuit court. See Battles v. State, 799 So.2d 1098 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Affirmed.

SALCINES and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

875 So. 2d 732, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8307, 2004 WL 1284206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagin-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack