Haggin v. Lorenze

25 Mont. 569
CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 16, 1901
DocketNo. 1,309
StatusPublished

This text of 25 Mont. 569 (Haggin v. Lorenze) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haggin v. Lorenze, 25 Mont. 569 (Mo. 1901).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is ordered that the request for an order dismissing the appeal be not considered, for the reason that no proper motion in that behalf has been filed or made, and for the further reason that the request is not signed or made by counsel of record herein.

(Mr. Chief Justice Brantly, having been of counsel, does not participate in the foregoing order.)

Appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

(Mr. Chief Justice Brantly, having been of counsel in the court below, does not participate in the foregoing order.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Mont. 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haggin-v-lorenze-mont-1901.