Haggett v. State
56 So. 172, 99 Miss. 844
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The testimony of the witness Ammons is not in conflict with the evidence of the two physicians, and from the evidence of these physicians it is manifest that appellant was too ill to be present at her trial, and consequently the motion for a continuance should have been sustained. Corbin v. State, 55 South. 43.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haggett v. State, 56 So. 172, 99 Miss. 844 (Mich. 1911).
56 So. 172 (Haggett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eastland v. State
78 So. 2d 127 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1955)
Jones v. State
37 So. 2d 311 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1948)
Ullom v. Davis
150 So. 519 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1933)
Sullivan v. Smith
116 So. 612 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1928)
Johnson v. State
67 So. 177 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1914)