Haggett v. State
56 So. 172, 99 Miss. 844
This text of 56 So. 172 (Haggett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Haggett v. State, 56 So. 172, 99 Miss. 844 (Mich. 1911).
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The testimony of the witness Ammons is not in conflict with the evidence of the two physicians, and from the evidence of these physicians it is manifest that appellant was too ill to be present at her trial, and consequently the motion for a continuance should have been sustained. Corbin v. State, 55 South. 43.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Eastland v. State
78 So. 2d 127 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1955)
Jones v. State
37 So. 2d 311 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1948)
Ullom v. Davis
150 So. 519 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1933)
Sullivan v. Smith
116 So. 612 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1928)
Johnson v. State
67 So. 177 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1914)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
56 So. 172, 99 Miss. 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haggett-v-state-miss-1911.