Haggerty v. Mangano

263 A.D.2d 430, 693 N.Y.S.2d 133, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8441

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New [431]*431York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered September 15, 1998, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint of plaintiff-tenant, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Plaintiff-tenant in the premises slipped on ice on the stoop of the building as she exited, fracturing her ankle. The accident happened approximately 75 minutes after a storm had deposited snow and ice in the area. Prior to the accident, defendants, or their agent, had cleared a path down the front steps.

As found by the IAS Court, there is a material issue of fact as to whether defendants’ snow and ice removal prior to plaintiffs fall created a dangerous condition or increased the natural hazard (see, Stoller v Riverbay Corp., 222 AD2d 343). Further, plaintiff submitted an affidavit from a visitor to the premises that day who was present when a tenant complained of the icy condition of the steps to defendants’ agents after the partial removal of snow and ice and before plaintiffs accident. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Tom and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haggerty v. Mangano, 263 A.D.2d 430, 693 N.Y.S.2d 133, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8441 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

263 A.D.2d 430 (Haggerty v. Mangano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stoller v. Riverbay Corp.
222 A.D.2d 343 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)