Haggard v. Waverly Pub. Co.

144 F. 490, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2974
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 30, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 144 F. 490 (Haggard v. Waverly Pub. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haggard v. Waverly Pub. Co., 144 F. 490, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2974 (circtdnj 1895).

Opinion

ACHESON, Circuit Judge.

The third specified ground of demurrer is mainly relied on. Whether the averments with respect to compliance with section 4962, Rev. St. U. S., are full enough, is a close [491]*491question; but I incline to the opinion that the facts alleged in the bill show a prima facie right to relief, and I resolve the doubt against the demurrant. This case, it would seem, involves important questions, which ought not to be passed on or discussed in the present condition of the record. The demurrer will be overruled, with leave to the defendant to plead or answer within 30 days. And it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harper v. Donohue
144 F. 491 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 F. 490, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haggard-v-waverly-pub-co-circtdnj-1895.