Haggar Apparel Co. v. United States

133 F. Supp. 2d 695, 25 Ct. Int'l Trade 168, 25 C.I.T. 168, 23 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1191, 2001 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 22
CourtUnited States Court of International Trade
DecidedMarch 5, 2001
DocketSLIP OP. 01-26; 93-06-00343
StatusPublished

This text of 133 F. Supp. 2d 695 (Haggar Apparel Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haggar Apparel Co. v. United States, 133 F. Supp. 2d 695, 25 Ct. Int'l Trade 168, 25 C.I.T. 168, 23 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1191, 2001 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 22 (cit 2001).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

MUSGRAVE, Judge.

In Haggar Apparel Co. v. United States, 20 CIT 842, 938 F.Supp. 868 (1996) (Di-Carlo, C.J.), the court entered judgment for the plaintiff, holding that it was entitled to a duty allowance on the subject merchandise under TSUS 807.00 and HTSUS 9802.00.80. See 20 CIT at 851, 938 F.Supp. at 875. That decision was affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. See Haggar Apparel Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 1460, 1462 (Fed. Cir.1997). Subsequently the Supreme Court vacated and remanded the Federal Circuit’s decision. See United States v. Haggar Apparel Co., 526 U.S. 380, 395, 119 *696 S.Ct. 1392, 143 L.Ed.2d 480 (1999). On remand, the Federal Circuit held that

Customs’ determination that the pants at issue do not qualify for the partial exception from duty allowed by HTSUS 9802.00.80 (and, in prior years, TSUS 807.00) must be sustained. The Court of International Trade’s judgment to the contrary is accordingly reversed, and the case is remanded with instructions to enter judgment in favor of the United States.

Haggar Apparel Co. v. United States, 222 F.3d 1337, 1343-44 (Fed.Cir.2000). Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the court’s prior entry of judgment in favor of Haggar Apparel Company is withdrawn, and it is further

ORDERED that the United States Customs Service’s determination that the apparel at issue does not qualify for the partial exception from duty allowed by TSUS 807.00 and HTSUS 9802.00.80 is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Haggar Apparel Co.
526 U.S. 380 (Supreme Court, 1999)
Haggar Apparel Co. v. United States
127 F.3d 1460 (Federal Circuit, 1998)
Haggar Apparel Co. v. United States
222 F.3d 1337 (Federal Circuit, 2000)
Haggar Apparel Co. v. United States
938 F. Supp. 868 (Court of International Trade, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 F. Supp. 2d 695, 25 Ct. Int'l Trade 168, 25 C.I.T. 168, 23 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1191, 2001 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haggar-apparel-co-v-united-states-cit-2001.