Haggans v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Haggans v. State

849 S.W.2d 959, 312 Ark. 599, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 236

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedApril 19, 1993

DocketCR 93-353

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 849 S.W.2d 959 (Haggans v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haggans v. State, 849 S.W.2d 959, 312 Ark. 599, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 236 (Ark. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Clifton Haggans, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Lohnes T. Tiner, admits by motion and brief that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI