Hagerty v. Nashua Look Co.
This text of 62 N.H. 576 (Hagerty v. Nashua Look Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On a quantum meruit the plaintiff demands what he is justly entitled to. The contract which he repudiated, and on which four payments had been made, was an entire one for two years’ work. He can recover no more than is equitably due ; and equity considers the whole transaction, including the fact that during the first four months he received more than he earned. The question of justice is not limited to a month, or to the damages for which the defendants can maintain an action against him. The law of the case is no more inconsistent with moral right than his contractual disability requires! Hall v. Butterfield, 59 N. H. 354; Bartlett v. Bailey, 59 N. H. 408.
Judgment for the plaintiff for ‡16.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 N.H. 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagerty-v-nashua-look-co-nh-1883.