Hagerman v. Titus
2 N.J.L. 164
This text of 2 N.J.L. 164 (Hagerman v. Titus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hagerman v. Titus, 2 N.J.L. 164 (N.J. 1807).
Opinion
— It hath been repeatedly decided that the copy of account or state of demand, delivered the justice, must set out the particular items of the account, that the defendant may be apprised of the nature of the demand against him; merely charging the defendant with an unsettled balance, is too vague and uncertain.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 N.J.L. 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hagerman-v-titus-nj-1807.